Local proposal QA
10/10
Final-cohort local proposal quality gates passed. The recorded decision is ACCEPT_PROPOSAL_ONLY.
Evidence snapshot · 2026-10-09
What the current evidence does—and does not—show.
This page records a dated, redacted view of the AI Clouds Company OS candidate. It separates local engineering checks and private prototype/review artifacts from customer, commercial, and production evidence.
Dated audit snapshot
Three facts, with their boundaries intact.
The following counts come from the local AC-003 technical audit and its evidence outline, reviewed for the 2026-10-09 snapshot. They are not a live status feed and should not be extended beyond the scopes stated here.
Provider previews
7
Private, noindex provider-preview receipts accepted in the reviewed receipt set. This is a bounded artifact count, not a customer count.
Product maturity
3
Product 3 — partially implemented. The audit does not classify the candidate as production-ready.
Scoped result
10/10 local proposal QA passes
The final v3 and v4 cohorts recorded ten unique businesses passing local site-quality gates: five in each cohort. The audit describes these as proposal-only checks, with artifact-bound validation such as content, accessibility, and release-package controls.
Interpretation: a local QA PASS means the reviewed proposal artifact met that scoped gate. It does not independently certify a deployed site, a customer, a sale, or production readiness.
Receipt-bound result
7 private noindex provider previews
Seven preview receipts in the reviewed Job014 and Job016 evidence were accepted by a provider for owner-review previews. They were private and marked noindex; the count is limited to those completed receipts at the audit snapshot. These are prototype/review artifacts, not live customer sites.
Interpretation: provider acceptance of a private preview is not public production, not customer approval, not verified sales, and not revenue.
Read the negative evidence carefully
What this snapshot does not establish
The audit is intentionally conservative. No link below is a substitute for an independently accepted live-system or commercial receipt.
No customer or commercial proof
The reviewed evidence shows no verified real customers, customer approval, outreach, replies, verified sales, signed orders, or revenue. Preview artifacts and discovered businesses must not be counted as customers; there are no verified sales.
No public production claim
The seven previews are not live customer sites and are not public production. This page provides no live demo, public deployment link, realtime health status, or exact current source-to-runtime acceptance claim.
No autonomous-operation claim
A source workflow, policy, role, test, or local artifact describes a design or bounded check. It does not prove that every guard is live, that the full handoff is complete, or that the system operates without human review.
No provider or model claim
This page does not claim current direct Anthropic API use, Claude customer-product invocation, or any other provider integration beyond what the dated audit specifically records.
Source provenance and method
A snapshot, not a self-certifying badge.
The source set is the dated COMPANYOS_TECHNICAL_EVIDENCE_OUTLINE.md and the read-only AC-003-store-audit.md, both prepared for 2026-10-09. The audit records source inspection, Git and artifact review, existing test evidence, provider receipts, and a runtime snapshot. It also states that later outputs may change the snapshot, that some artifacts are not tied to the current source revision, and that status files cannot certify themselves.
For that reason, this page publishes only the bounded counts above. It omits private URLs, credentials, customer details, raw security configuration, and attack-relevant policy or runtime information.
Continue exploring the candidate
Read the system context or return to the customer-facing overview.